Global warmingby | 29-11-2014 18:16 |
|---|
 Warm greetings from Russia! Today, I'd like to speak about global warming.
The instrument on the NASA satellite for measuring global temperature shows absolutely no signs of warming over the last decade, writes Forbes. This applies to the middle latitudes of the Northern hemisphere, where traces of anthropogenic climate impact should be strongly felt. This refers to the global ocean temperature and global temperature as a whole. If an emission of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the main factor increasing the temperature, where is it? There is a difference between the theory of global warming and panic theory of global warming in the spirit of "we all die". The key idea of the theory is that certain gases heat the atmosphere. It is according to the scientific community. Many people suggest that even a slight increase in the volume of these gases has a significant impact on the climate. However, this contradicts our climatic realities. The rise in global temperature in the twentieth century happened even before the economic boom that occurred after World War II. Emissions of carbon dioxide during this period were small. Between 1945 and 1977 years they have grown significantly, but here's the problem: global temperatures on the contrary decreased. The proportion of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere on 2014 is 0,0392%. Even if you increase this share to 25 times (which must be approximately the same increase in industrial production), it will still be less than 1%. And, it's a pretty good conclusion, as I can see. |
