The production of goods for consumers in rich nations leaves a deep footprint in the form of potentially-dangerous nitrogen pollution in developing countries.
Reactive nitrogen, generated in large part by fuel combustion and agriculture – mainly fertiliser use – can contribute to air and water pollution, climate change and acid rain.
A study in the journal Nature Geoscience said many developed nations had a sky-high nitrogen pollution ?footprint? – much of it left far away in the developing world. A ?footprint? is the amount of reactive nitrogen emitted during the production, consumption and transportation of goods and services used in a particular country, regardless of where production took place.
?High-income nations are responsible for more than 10 times the emissions of the poorest nations,? said study co-author Arunima Malik of the University of Sydney.
Emissions per person ranged from over 100kg per year in nations like Hong Kong and Luxembourg, to less than 7kg in Papua New Guinea, Ivory Coast and Liberia.
?These differences reflect wealthy consumers? preference for animal products and highly processed food,? wrote the research team. ?We conclude that substantial local nitrogen pollution is driven by demand from consumers in other countries.?
Nitrogen is a key building block of all life on Earth and is the most abundant element in the atmosphere, and is crucial for plant growth. Reactive nitrogen is a less stable form which binds with other chemicals to cause smog, for example, or nitrogen oxide, a poisonous gas belted out by diesel cars.
Based on a global trade database of 188 countries, the study showed the bulk of nitrogen emissions in 2010 came from industry and agriculture, which accounted for 161 teragrammes (Tg or one billion kg), while 28Tg was produced by consumers, mainly from sewage.
Consumption in the United States, China, India and Brazil, was responsible for nearly half the world?s nitrogen pollution, they added.
There was much consumers could do to change the trend. For countries such as the United States, if consumers ate according to the national and international protein recommendations and reduced food waste by 50%, their total nitrogen footprint would decrease by over 35%. – AFP
4 Comments
Thanks for the report, I confirm that nitrogen pollution is so effective.
Posted 14-02-2016 03:03
Informative report..
Posted 13-02-2016 02:46
Insightful findings. Around 35% of the food in developed countries is wasted at the consumer level, thus this is one of the major reasons behind the significant difference in the emissions of nitrogen.
Posted 12-02-2016 19:36
Interesting report. Consumers should change their eating /food consumption(Big no to food wastage) trend to reduce nitrogen emission. Thanks for the report.
Posted 12-02-2016 18:34