7
Comments
The Issue of Air Pollution in the Philippines |
---|
by Adam Zhou | 20-03-2016 16:11
|
Today is a day where the skyscrapers and grimy factories exhaled gusts of a retching, murky substance and where the rumbling of Audis and Ferraris would spew the same harmful chemicals into the cluster of trees, now shaded away from the morning?s sunlight. The air here looks innocuous, and the skies often take a deep cerulean hue that masks the dangers that lurk in the air. Air pollution, a major issue in populated and industrialized cities in Metro Manila remains to hover above the millions of commuters who have become unaware of its impact . Each city in this megalopolis is overcrowded with the multitudes of cars and people, either going to work, the malls, or even visiting a close relative. When doing so myself, I get a glimpse of the factories accompanied by the decaying urban architecture while a single tree could come up a few times on the side of expressways. Trees could greatly cushion the impact of air pollution while not much is being done to plant them where it is needed most. In different areas, the skies could vary from a hazy blue speckled with quite a number of gray clouds while in another, those same clouds would fill up an entire atmosphere. Dust particles appear to shower more than necessary and even after the cleansing rain, the same consequences persist. Many vehicles and manufacturing plants, being some of the main causes due to economic growths within the region continue to disregard the environmental impact and what our city may turn out to be in the near future. According to the World Health Organization, air pollution has been the culprit of 7 million deaths during 2012, therefore being the environment?s most dangerous health risk. Other health risks would include difficulty of breathing, respiratory illness, and damaged cells within a body system. As a matter of fact, the main focus is on vehicles, taking approximately 70 to 80% of such emissions while the latter belongs to commercial centers, factories, and other similar origins. Infamous traffic levels amounting to 28,000 hours lost in Metro Manila per commuter within a lifetime just proves how much carbon dioxide can be produced. Current government placed policies to reduce the amount of traffic such as that of the coding system has gone without success. The coding system in Metro Manila is where the number your plate number ends in determines the day where the vehicle isn?t allowed on the road. However, loopholes such as bribery and buying more cars gets past the system. One solution to this, however, is giving vehicle's a specific life span around the range of five years or less before being recycled or reused for other products. Because old cars produce a higher rate of carbon dioxide than other vehicles and it contributes to traffic rates, having them last for such a long time wouldn?t be beneficial. Another solution would be to enforce easier accessibility of public transportation such as buses and urban railway networks to reduce the amount of traffic as traffic congestion is severely threatening to the wellbeing of a city especially in terms of time consumption and of course adding to the pollution rate. If more people take these forms of public transport, a lesser number of cars and a lower rate of traffic will be apparent in our daily lives. |
![]() ![]() |
|
7 Comments
Adam, thanks for informing us about current situation in the Philippines. I agree with the point that enlarging public transporation system is necessary, but putting limits on the use of automobiles might not be the best solution. It may discourage ones who are planning to use their cars economically, and comparing with the cost for producing new products, the air pollution from old cars may not be that much. Anyways, thanks for your opinion and have a great day :-)
Posted 21-03-2016 22:21
Hi Adam! thank you for sharing your thoughts. Well,, many have already mentioned their opposition to your argument and I'm afraid I'm also on their side on this matter. Limiting the lifespan of vehicles does not seem to yield any benefit for environment, besides it would be impossible to enforce this. No one would welcome environmentalists had it been pushed by them,, haha. Thank you for your different approach!
Posted 21-03-2016 11:07
Nice report ,but I agree to Nilajan. Banning vehicles after 5 years would not be a smart decision..I think incentive the use of collective transportation is the best solution for now... New technology is also needed.
Posted 21-03-2016 04:28
Great report. Air pollution is a killer
Posted 21-03-2016 04:00
Nice report ,but I think banning vehicles after 5 years would not be an economically friendly decision..I would rather suggest regular servicing of cars to make the cars less polluting..
Posted 21-03-2016 02:16
Like almost everywhere, in your city too, industries and transport contribute most to the air pollution. I agree with you that there should be norms to phase out very old vehicles. There should mass emission standards , regular pollution checks of vehicles. Hybrid /electric cars to be introduced.
Thanks for the great report.
Posted 20-03-2016 23:37
Let us join hands to combat air pollution! Thanks for the wonderful report, Adam!
Posted 20-03-2016 18:12