| Share facebook | RSS

4
Comments

ambassador Report View

Pesticide use in Korea pros and cons

by Jiwon HAN | 17-09-2017 01:21 recommendations 0

Basic facts:

Korea is traditionally a farming country. Though the image of Korea nowadays is portrayed as an IT nation, it was not until 1970s when Korea became invested in industrialization. Before then, most Koreans lived in the countryside harvesting rice, which we eat every day. Chemical pesticides in Korea is said to be introduced during the end of Chosun era, which is about 1870s. Missionaries from the west had introduced the pesticides. Though it was not widely used at first, constant developments were made (mostly from western countries) and now chemical pesticides are used nearly everywhere.

 

Incidents/Accidents:

1. Organic food is very popular in Korea, especially for those who live in the cities. Since the townspeople are not experts in discerning what is organic or not, people rely on organic marks certified by the government. However, there have been rumors saying that the verifying process the government takes is to lax the officials glimpse at the farming site only once before giving out the mark. This had been problematic in the early 2000s, so hopefully, the situation would have improved.

2. Chemical pesticides are very dangerous to health, and therefore laws ban the most fatal pesticides from the public. Also, all online pesticide purchase is banned. In reality however, pesticides actually are attainable in pesticide shops in the city, or National Agriculture Cooperative Federation.

3. There was a shocking murder case in 2012 using a harmful pesticide called Gramoxone. A woman had purposely killed her family for insurance money. Paying attention to the fact that Gramoxone was extremely harmful even in a small dose, she committed the crime (extremely dreadful case).

 

Pros:

True, the consumption rate of rice for Koreans has decreased to 70% as western style meals are gaining popularity. But Korea still needs to harvest appropriate amount of rice, at least for food security reasons. Coupled with the fact that the Korea-Chinese FTA has opened rice market for both countries, our farmers would suffer greatly if they are forced to exclude pesticides. Also, it is highly unrealistic for all the farmers of the country to suddenly stop using chemical pesticides.

 

Cons:

Chemical pesticides are harmful, as it accumulates in human body. Though the harms had not been realized in Korea, the risks are too high. And not just for humans, too. Chemical pesticides harm the fertility of soil, making the crops yield less in the long term. Careless use of pesticides might make it leak to nearby water sources, harming the whole region. As mentioned above, organic is a huge boom in Korea. Though it may be complicated, transforming the techniques to non-pesticide seems to be the answer that will satisfy the consumers, producers, and nature.

 
source: 123RF

no image

  • Dormant user Jiwon HAN
 
 
  • recommend

4 Comments

  • says :
    interesting
    Posted 01-02-2018 23:55

  • says :
    thanks for sharing
    Posted 01-02-2018 23:55

  • says :
    Hi, Jiwon! Thanks for your report on pesticide use in South Korea. There are actually a number of different methods of organic farming that can be used in place of chemical pesticides. However, the biggest problem is the cost of these methods. Since raising crops organically currently requires more money and may result in low productivity, organic produce is way more expensive than produce raised with the usage of pesticides. Since most people are unsure as to whether the benefits of eating organic can compensate for the high cost, pesticide-using produce is still more superior in the market. In order for organic farming to prosper, either (a) consumers have to be convinced that eating organic is worth the price or (b) chemical pesticide-free farming methods have to become more affordable. I think the current solution is a mix of the two: that safe and affordable farming methods should keep being developed, and that consumers keep buying produce from safe agricultural practices. In addition to this, strict laws should be incorporated to inspect agricultural methods and the use of pesticides. The problem that you mentioned in your report, about the lax verifying process, proves that inspection should be strengthened. Great work!
    Posted 28-09-2017 18:14

  • says :
    Hi, Jiwon! Thanks for your great report! You mentioned a recent agricultural state of South Korea very well. And also you said it's highly unrealistic for all the farmers to do their farming without chemical pesticides, but actually many alternative methods which are environmentally friendly are discovered and adjusted to the real farming fields. It means that people are trying to understand the importance of non-pesticide farming foods for their health. Even though pesticides have a great effect on killing weeds or injurious insects so to increase productivity, we have to discover and apply alternatives like using environmentally friendly fertilizer or raising creatures which can eliminate weed sprout and harmful insects! Or any further developing farming techniques could also be a great opportunity to achieve non-pesticide farming.
    Posted 22-09-2017 00:43

Post a comment

Please sign in

Opportunities

Resources