4
Comments
(December thematic report): Country's environmental regulation or infrastructure. |
---|
by Nishan kc | 14-01-2021 00:11 0 |
Nepal¡¯s National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 2029 (1973) Section 26: Punishment Fifth Amendment (1) Any person who illegally kills or injures, sells, purchases or transfers or obtains rhinoceros, tiger, elephant, musk deer, clouded leopard, snow leopard or bison, or keeps, purchases or sells rhinoceros horn or musk-pods or the fur of snow leopard as well as trophies of any other protected wildlife, shall be punished with a fine ranging from five lakhs to ten lakhs Nepali rupees or an imprisonment ranging from five years to fifteen years or both. (2) Any person who kills or injures any other protected wildlife other than those mentioned in Sub-Section (1) shall be punished with a fine ranging from one lakh to five lakhs rupees, or face an imprisonment ranging from one year to ten years or both. (3) Any person who hunts and kills or injures wildlife other than birds and fish inside a national park, strict nature reserve or wildlife reserve without obtaining a license shall be punished with a fine ranging from twenty thousand rupees and fifty thousand rupees or face imprisonment ranging from six months to one year or both. (4) Any person who hunts and kills or injures protected birds shall be punished with a fine ranging from fifteen thousand rupees to thirty thousand rupees or face imprisonment ranging from three months to nine months or both. (5) Any person who hunts and kills or injures birds other than protected birds inside a national park, strict nature reserve or wildlife reserve without obtaining a license shall be punished with a fine ranging from twenty thousand rupees to fifty thousand rupees, or face imprisonment ranging between six months and one year or both. (6) Any person who commits an offense other than those mentioned in Sub Section (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5), in contravention of this Act or the Rules framed under the Act shall be punished with a fine up ranging from twenty thousand rupees to fifty thousand rupees or one years imprisonment or both depending on the nature of the case. Source: National Law Commission. Government of Nepal. National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 2029 (1973). Available at: http://www.lawcommission.gov.np/en/archives/category/documents/prevailing-law/statutes-acts/national-parks-and-wildlife-conservation-act-2029-1973 Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC). National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 2029 (1973). Pic: Logo of Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), Nepal. |
|
4 Comments
Greetings nishan
I hope you are doing well
Thank you so much for this report
Keep writing
Green cheers
Regards
Asmita Gaire
Posted 13-02-2021 15:32
Hello Nishan!
It's your SJ mentor.
I hope you are doing well.
Thank you for introducing Nepal's wildlife-related conservation laws.
The law seems to be well established to protect wildlife in national parks.
It is good to introduce the law simply, but I would like to hear your opinion about it.
It would be better if you could tell us more about whether you think laws should be strengthened or how you think laws should be changed in the future.
Hope things are fine with you.
Keep writing!
Best regards,
SJ mentor.
Posted 18-01-2021 05:31
Greetings from Nepal
Thank you for sharing your information about environmental regulations
Our country should implement all these rules and regulation completely.
Regards
Dolma
Posted 17-01-2021 00:38
Hello Nishan,
this is your mentor WooJoo.
I hope you are doing well.
Thank you for sharing such an informative report regarding environmental regulations in Nepal.
I am surprised by how wildlife conservation Act is precisely described.
I would like to know if, after the Act was enacted, there was remarkable outcome in protecting endangered wildlife.
The wildlife is becoming short of food, habitat and optimum climate to reproduce and grow.
Therefore, any illegal poaching , hunting should be banned and each individual should comply with the regulations.
It seems that the amendment talks much about birds, and I would like to know if there is any reason for this.
Keep sharing
Regards,
WooJoo
Posted 16-01-2021 19:23