| Share facebook | RSS

3
Comments

ambassador Report View

Environmental Effects if Urbanisation

by Chhavi Singh | 16-04-2022 02:34 recommendations 0

Urban populations interact with their environment. Urban people change their environment through their consumption of food, energy, water, and land. And in turn, the polluted urban environment affects the health and quality of life of the urban population.

People who live in urban areas have very different consumption patterns than residents in rural areas. For example, urban populations consume much more food, energy, and durable goods than rural populations. In China during the 1970s, the urban populations consumed more than twice as much pork as the rural populations who were raising the pigs. With economic development, the difference in consumption declined as the rural populations ate better diets. But even a decade later, urban populations had 60 percent more pork in their diets than rural populations. The increasing consumption of meat is a sign of growing affluence in Beijing; in India where many urban residents are vegetarians, greater prosperity is seen in higher consumption of milk.

Urban populations not only consume more food, but they also consume more durable goods. In the early 1990s, Chinese households in urban areas were two times more likely to have a TV, eight times more likely to have a washing machine, and 25 times more likely to have a refrigerator than rural households. This increased consumption is a function of urban labor markets, wages, and household structure.

Energy consumption for electricity, transportation, cooking, and heating is much higher in urban areas than in rural villages. For example, urban populations have many more cars than rural populations per capita. Almost all of the cars in the world in the 1930s were in the United States. Today we have a car for every two people in the United States. If that became the norm, in 2050 there would be 5.3 billion cars in the world, all using energy.

In China the per capita consumption of coal in towns and cities is over three times the consumption in rural areas. Comparisons of changes in world energy consumption per capita and GNP show that the two are positively correlated but may not change at the same rate.

As countries move from using noncommercial forms of energy to commercial forms, the relative price of energy increases. Economies, therefore, often become more efficient as they develop because of advances in technology and changes in consumption behavior. The urbanization of the world¡¯s populations, however, will increase aggregate energy use, despite efficiencies and new technologies. And the increased consumption of energy is likely to have deleterious environmental effects.

Urban consumption of energy helps create heat islands that can change local weather patterns and weather downwind from the heat islands. The heat island phenomenon is created because cities radiate heat back into the atmosphere at a rate 15 percent to 30 percent less than rural areas. The combination of the increased energy consumption and difference in albedo (radiation) means that cities are warmer than rural areas (0.6 to 1.3 C). And these heat islands become traps for atmospheric pollutants. Cloudiness and fog occur with greater frequency. Precipitation is 5 percent to 10 percent higher in cities; thunderstorms and hailstorms are much more frequent, but snow days in cities are less common.

Urbanization also affects the broader regional environments. Regions downwind from large industrial complexes also see increases in the amount of precipitation, air pollution, and the number of days with thunderstorms. Urban areas affect not only the weather patterns, but also the runoff patterns for water. Urban areas generally generate more rain, but they reduce the infiltration of water and lower the water tables. This means that runoff occurs more rapidly with greater peak flows. Flood volumes increase, as do floods and water pollution downstream.

Many of the effects of urban areas on the environment are not necessarily linear. Bigger urban areas do not always create more environmental problems. And small urban areas can cause large problems. Much of what determines the extent of the environmental impacts is how the urban populations behave — their consumption and living patterns — not just how large they are.

 

no image

  • Dormant user Chhavi Singh
 
 
  • recommend

3 Comments

  • Nayoung Kim says :
    Thank you so much for the useful information!

    Posted 02-08-2022 01:25

  • Chelwoon Mentor says :
    Hello Chhavi, this is your mentor Chelwoon.

    It is a dilemma that we often experience such as environmental degradation due to economic and social development. We must continue to strive to find better ways to protect our environment despite developments. If we do not take care of the environment and ignore the negative effects of urbanization on it, we will surely pay for the consequences of what we have done.

    Thank you for the article!

    Regards,
    Chelwoon

    Posted 18-04-2022 18:47

  • Joon Mentor says :
    Hello Chhavi, this is your mentor Joon.

    Urbanization played huge roll on improving human life standard as more people got access to social infrastructure, however, when it comes to the scope of nature, it only affected negatively. Though there might be some positive outcomes including the reduced loss of energy as the transmission is reduced compared to the days it was not urbanized, but unexpected phenomenon including heat island mentioned in your article. Though the development might be good looking, we should always go along with nature.

    Well read your article, and let's keep up!

    Best,

    Joon
    Posted 17-04-2022 01:02

Post a comment

Please sign in

Opportunities

Resources