| Share facebook | RSS

2
Comments

ambassador Report View

[April Theme Report 2023] The United States Environmental Protection Agency suggests a law to prevent deadly air pollution caused by fine particulate matter - Tara Malhotra

by Tara Malhotra | 12-04-2023 13:24 recommendations 1

Tara Malhotra
April Theme Report 2023

The United States Environmental Protection Agency suggests a law to prevent deadly air pollution caused by fine particulate matter

(Means of Lowering Pollutant Emissions)

Eleven years after their last fine soot regulations, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking action to enact a new law in order to remove harmful pollution in the air.

Fine soot is a form of particle pollution (also known as PM2.5) existing in the atmosphere. This matter has a diameter of under 2.5 micrometers. The Center for American Progress found that it is commonly produced by coal burning, industrial production, motor vehicles, and oil refineries. Fine soot is a particularly deadly pollutant, being known to cause cancer, heart attacks, asthma, and strokes, as reported by the Environmental Defense Fund.

According to the EPA, the existing annual rules do not allow greater than 12 micrograms of fine particle pollution in each cubic meter of the atmosphere. Now, the EPA wants to change the maximum to nine or ten micrograms, although this range could be altered anywhere from eight to eleven during the legal process.

Cable News Network (CNN) Health wrote that these proposed changes were mainly prompted by the present health risks and the need to reduce them. In addition, in 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) advised organizations like the EPA to adjust the limit to five micrograms of fine particle pollution per cubic meter of air. The WHO hopes that this recommendation could lower deaths from this type of pollution by 80%.

The EPA still has yet to meet the WHO¡¯s goal of five micrograms, and other organizations have been urging them to continue taking steps past eight micrograms for the health benefits. As of right now, the EPA¡¯s current actions to create better regulations have expressed a possible interest in pursuing the process until they reach five micrograms or lower.

Michael Regan, the EPA Administrator, expressed his high hopes for the well-researched efforts of the new law proposal.

¡°Fine particulate matter is both deadly and extremely costly. This proposal is anchored in the best available science and reflects input from the public and scientific experts. [Strengthening this standard will deliver] transformative benefits nationally,¡± Regan said.



Air pollution coming from factories. Photo courtesy of Grist.

Air pollution coming from factories. Photo courtesy of Grist.
 
Air pollution coming from factories. Photo courtesy of Grist.

TaraMalhotra

  • United States Of America Former E-gen Ambassador Tara Malhotra
 
 
  • recommend

2 Comments

  • Yewon Mentor says :
    Hello Tara! This is your mentor Yewon.
    First of all, I apologize for the late comment.

    You have shared an interesting news of America through your report!
    As you mentioned in the beginning of your report, fine particular matter have lots of negative impacts on humans and environment, so governments all around the world are trying to reduce them. I think this suggestion is one of them! I hope this suggestion could be helpful to reduce fine particular matter and decrease air pollution!

    Thank you for your specific and interesting report! Great job!!
    Posted 10-05-2023 16:21

  • James Mentor says :
    Hello Tara! This is your mentor James.

    I honestly didn't know that PM is also known as fine soot. It really does make sense since most of the particulate matter originates from a combustion reaction in a chemical or mechanical process. I'm currently wondering at what size of fine soot/PM would bring about the worse health effects because if the worse ones are particles smaller than 5 micrometers, technological development for fine soot capture would be urgently needed instead of legislative innovation. But I still firmly believe that continuous lowering of the PM size limit would definitely improve air quality within the corresponding region.

    Thanks for your report! I can't wait to read your next one.
    Posted 13-04-2023 16:12

Post a comment

Please sign in

Opportunities

Resources