Environmental Networking Platform for Children and Youth by SAMSUNG E&A
Stay connected with Eco-generation :
| Share 
| 
- Home >
- Our Actions >
- World report
14
Comments
Talking about climate change |
|---|
|
by Meena Pandey | 22-10-2019 13:22
|
|
What evidence do we have of climate change? The most compelling climate change evidence scientists have of climate change is long term data relating atmospheric CO2 levels and global temperature, sea level, the expanse of ice, the fossil record and the distribution of species. This data, which goes back millions of years, shows a strong correlation between CO2 levels and temperature. Recent data shows a trend of increasing temperature and rising CO2 levels beginning in the early 19th century. Because all parts of the global climate are connected, scientists have been able to create models of how changes caused by heating should work their way through the entire system and appear in different areas, for example, sea level, intemperate weather, the movement of fish species in the ocean. Testing whether or not predicted changes have occurred is an important way to verify underlying theory. This can be done in two ways. First, it is possible to load a model with historical data and ask: how well does this model predict what we know happened? NASA and other scientific agencies have done this and found that the models work well. A second way to test is to use the model to predict upcoming changes and then to see if emerging reality fits. It is possible to track the rapid retreat of glaciers and observe the summer melting of the Polar Ice Cap. Sea levels are rising measurably, the temperature of the world’s oceans is demonstrably rising and consequently many fish species are moving to follow waters that are the right temperature for them. Correlating these changes to the timing of rises in CO2 levels and temperature suggests relationship. NASA provides a good visual tool for viewing these relational models “in action”. In specific instances, for example, CO2 levels, temperature and ocean pH, the chemical processes are traceable proving direct causal connection. Visual impacts of climate change evidence: 1)Flooding 2)Worsening droughts 3)Melting glaciers 4)Rising sea levels 5)Super cell storms 6)Increasing tornadoes Climate Change – Scientists View – Do all scientists agree that climate change is occurring and is caused by human activity? No. Despite the apparent scientists view consensus among scientists, NGOs, international organizations, policy makers and the media, there are respected scientists who remain “climate skeptics,” that is, who doubt that the overall theory of human induced global climate change is correct, or that the observed phenomena demonstrate conclusively that it is, or that the observed phenomena are anything out of the ordinary (viewed in the time frame of “earth history”). It is important to separate these scientists from ‘skeptics’ who have a financial interest in denying climate change. These people have been important in framing the climate change debate in the United States and the position of the United States government on the issue of climate change. Their success has little to do with alternative science, however, and everything to do with the permeability of the US political process to the influence of such actors. It is also important to separate these scientists from the ignorant and people who do not understand evidence-based science. Such people are simply uninformed or misinformed, make such ignorant statements as “it’s just a theory” or cite isolated facts as if they mattered. Their numbers have made this group politically powerful in the US, but their ignorance sidelines them in the global debate. Climate skeptics fall into three camps: those like Freeman Dyson, Bjorn Lomborg and Kiminori Itoh who acknowledge climate change, but think that carbon-based theory and current models are too simplistic to capture such a complex process; those like Ivar Giaever who think that the data is too thin to support such bold claims; and those like Will Happer who contend that the nice analogy of a greenhouse does not apply and that CO2 is too insignificant to be the culprit. An article prepared to accompany a petition urging the US not to sign global climate accords reviews each of the main contentions of climate change scientists view and presents data suggesting that each is wrong. The authors of the article cite data, for example, that suggests that the earth’s temperature today is essentially at the 3,000-year average global temperature, while during the Medieval period, long before the use of fossil fuels, temperatures were 24⁰ C higher. In a similar vein, they cite data to suggest that glacier shortening began in the early 19th century, 25 years before the start of intensive fossil fuel use. For a more recent web piece by a well-informed, non-scientist skeptic, see David Siegel’s “scientists view on global warming” |
|
|
|
|
Previous : World Migratory Bird Day 2019
14 Comments
Hello Meena didi,
Hope you are doing great,
Thank you so much for your informative report on climate change,
Keep writing,
Green Cheers,
Bindu
Posted 18-07-2021 20:48
Hello meena
I hope you are doing well!
Nice report
Keep writing
Thank you so much for this report!
Looking forward to reading some more reports.
Green cheers!
Best regards
Hema
Posted 19-03-2020 11:39
Greetings meena
I hope you are doing well
Thank you so much for this great report
I hope to read more from you!
Green cheers
Regards
Ishma
Posted 17-03-2020 12:27
Hello meena
I hope you are doing well.
Thank you so much for this report.
Green cheers
Regards
Sus
Posted 07-03-2020 18:52
Hello meena
I hope you are doing well
Thank you so much for this report
Regards
Sus
Posted 01-03-2020 10:30
Greetings meena sis
I hope you are doing well !
Climate change is a real. And evidences are clearly visible like you mentioned.
Thank you so much for this wonderful report.
Green cheers
Regards
Asmita Gaire
Posted 27-01-2020 15:46
Thank you Sandhya.
Posted 26-10-2019 01:59
Well articulated report on this topic,
Keep writing on such a great report,
Yours,
sandhya
Posted 24-10-2019 20:43
Thank you Tula Raj for your words.
Posted 23-10-2019 23:35
Wow!!!
Happy to see such report.
Yours,
TULA RAJ
Posted 23-10-2019 23:30
Thank you Sagar dai.
Posted 22-10-2019 23:55
Thank you Prakriti!!!
Posted 22-10-2019 23:54
Hello Meena ,
Nice report on Climate Change .I am happy with the way you are bringing variations in the thematic topics .Wish you best wishes.
Regards,
Sagar Koirala
Posted 22-10-2019 15:01
Hey Meena. Thank you for your beautiful writing
Keep writing and shining
Regards
Prakriti Ghimire
Posted 22-10-2019 13:47